CASE F

Following its May 10, 2022, final order, the Agency filed a timely appeal with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC or Commission) pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.403(a). On appeal, the Agency requests that the Commission affirm its rejection of an EEOC Administrative Judge’s (AJ) finding of discrimination in violation of Title VII of the…

Read More

CASE E

The Administrative Judge found in the favor of the Complainant and ruled as follows: Pursuant to the Administrative Judge’s (“AJ”) August 5, 2021, Final Decision on Liability (“Decision”) in favor of the Complainant and pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.501(e)(2) and 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k), as a prevailing party, she hereby submits her Verified Petition…

Read More

CASE D

After Chartmans obtained a substantial award at hearing against the defendant federal agency, Complainant filed an appeal with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC” or “Commission”), pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.504, alleging noncompliance with the Agency’s Final Order concerning her equal employment opportunity (“EEO”) complaint, wherein an EEOC Administrative Judge (“AJ”) found the Agency…

Read More

CASE C

The Administrative Judge issued the following relief: The Agency is ordered to: 1. Within 60 days of its Final Agency Decision, the Agency shall pay Complainant non-pecuniary compensatory damages in the amount of $187,500; 2. Within 60 days of its final agency decision, the agency shall pay the complainant’s costs in the amount of $5,408.…

Read More

CASE B

Administrative Judge rules as follows: In connection with the captioned matter, Complainant seeks (I) removal of the letter of caution and the letter of reprimand from her personnel files; (2) reinstatement to a position, including transportation agreement, living quarters allowance, and other costs related to reinstatement; (3) past pecuniary, compensatory damages; (4) non-pecuniary, compensatory damages;…

Read More

CASE A

The Administrative Judge rules as follows: Complainant, pursuant to the Administrative Judge’s (“AJ”) June 30, 2022, decision in favor of Complainant and pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 1614.501(e)(2) and 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k), as a prevailing party, was awarded nonpecuniary compensatory damages in the amount of $300,000.00, costs in the amount of $9,015.86, and front…

Read More